Aye, the little fella played a bonny innings. But for me, the day belonged as much to someone who was just a bit taller. Someone who scored less than half the runs that Sachin did.
But man, he was every bit as bonny as the little fella. I am referring to VVS Laxman’s 51.
For many people this would be sacrilege, but for me, this series has been all about how VVS has quietly gone about showing that he is perhaps India’s best batsman in a crisis since a certain GR Vishwanath, who shared the same penchant for coming good when India seemed to need him the most. And like Laxman, he could do so with amazing grace – seemingly caressing the ball to death. And just as Laxman has been overshadowed by Sachin, so too was GR perennially in shade of a certain Sunil Manohar Gavaskar. But the shadow was largely statistical – Sachin and Sunny had infinitely better records than GR and VVS, but it would be a brave person (or an insane fan) who would say that there was too much separating the foursome in terms of sheer quality.
It was this quality that enabled VVS to shine even when Tendulkar was wreaking havoc at Adelaide earlier today. And of course, he got the runs when India had got into a minor crisis – the score 156-4 and Ganguly had been dismissed cheaply (the bowler and umpire teaming up rather well on that one, I thought, but that’s another story). He added 126 with Sachin, flicking and cutting his way to an elegant 51 before falling victim to a Lee bouncer. Once again, he had helped dig India out of a hole. And done so without having appeared to be digging at all.
The Aussies must hate the very sight of him. As for me, I will simply paraphrase what the great Sir Raymond Priestley had said about Antartic Explorers:
“"For scientific batting, give me Rahul Dravid; for swift and efficient run accumulation, Sachin Tendulkar; but when you are in a hopeless situation, when there seems to be no way out, get on your knees and pray for VVS Laxman."
'nuff said.
